Surveys
Transitional Government in Afghanistan
Download the PDF Report of this Survey
Share this page
Summary
In April, 2,500 women and girls aged 18-60 in Herat, Nangarhar, Balkh, Helmand, Takhar, Bamiyan, Kandahar, Daikundi, Panjshir, Jawzjan, Farah, Faryab, Badghis, Baghlan, Kunar, and Paktia were polled on Transitional Government.
-
Over half (69.4%) of the respondents felt a ceasefire agreement should be enforced before the establishment of a Transitional Government.
-
Three fourths (73.44%) of the respondents said elections should take place to identify the president of a Transitional Government while 14.96% said the international community should select the president.
-
Half (54.24%) of the respondents believed power should be centralized within a Transitional Government while 15.24% felt it should be decentralized.
-
76.4% of the respondents said that 40-50% of the Transitional Government should be occupied by women if it is to be considered inclusive.
Data Explorer
Welcome to our Survey Data Explorer. Using Microsoft Power BI you can see the results of this month’s survey, and use the interactive controls to explore the data in more detail.
Page Controls: Navigate through different pages of the dashboard by clicking on the page numbers or using the arrows to move forward or backward.
Full Screen: Click the arrows icon button located at the bottom right corner of the visualization.
Filters: Use the drop-down menus to filter the data based on specific criteria such as province, age group, or profession.
Analysis of Provincial Findings
Disputes over guiding principles in Intra-Afghan Talks was a key issue that slowed down the pace of talks in the first phase of negotiations. The Taliban Negotiating team wanted the US-Taliban Agreement to be recognized as a principle document during talks, while the Republic Negotiating Team proposed four alternatives as guiding principles:
- If the US-Taliban Agreement is recognized as a principal agreement, so should the tripartite declaration between the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, the United States, and NATO.
- Neither the US-Taliban Agreement nor the Tripartite Declaration should be the basis for negotiations, rather the negotiations should be furthered on the basis of the Consultative Loya Jirga Declaration.
- The national interests of Afghanistan should be the basis for negotiations.
- Reference to Quran and Hadith to resolve disagreements during negotiations.
Eventually, the prolonged discussions culminated in four guiding principles that were agreed upon on 02 December 2020:
- The US-Taliban Agreement signed on February 29, 2020.
- The demand of the Afghan people for a sustainable peace.
- Commitment of the negotiating parties to a sustainable peace.
- Demands of the United Nations for a durable peace in Afghanistan.
Close to half (48.1%) of the 21018 respondents in Herat, Takhar, Balkh, Bamiyan, Nangarhar, Kandahar, and Helmand said they were aware that the negotiating parties had agreed on these four principles while an almost equal number (48.4%) said they were not. But when asked if they were aware that discussions on these principles were the reason that slowed the pace of talks, a majority (63.25%) said yes while 35.6% said no. A majority (69.9%) said they were concerned that the US-Taliban Agreement was made as one of the guiding principles and felt this could jeopardize the gains of the past two decades. Furthermore, when asked if the three principles namely demand of the Afghan people for a sustainable peace, commitment of the negotiating parties to a sustainable peace, and demands of the United Nations for a durable peace in Afghanistan were sufficient enough to safeguard the gains of the last two decades, close to half (48.73%) said they were not while one fifth (20.3%) said they were sufficient.
News Feed
Read More Surveys
Impact of the New Criminal Code on Women and Girls in Afghanistan
A survey involved 7,649 women from 33 provinces was conducted to assess the impact of the new Criminal Code on women and girls under Taliban rule. This survey explored women’s awareness of the new decree, their experiences and perceptions of the justice system, and the implications of the new legal provisions on their rights, safety, and access to justice. The survey reveals the challenges women face in seeking legal protection and accountability and offers valuable insights into the social, legal, and personal consequences of the new Criminal Code on the lives of Afghan women and girls.
Access to Health for Women and Girls in Afghanistan
A survey of 8,085 women across 34 provinces on how women and girls access healthcare under Taliban rule. Respondents identified where they seek medical help, which female health providers their communities lack, and the main obstacles they face in receiving treatment. The findings highlight the severe constraints shaping women’s health choices and their limited access to essential care.
Afghan Women’s Perspectives on Governance under Taliban Rule
A survey involved 7,988 women from 33 provinces was conducted to assess Afghan women’s perspectives on governance under Taliban rule. This survey explore women’s experiences and perspectives on how Taliban governance affects their lives. The survey reveals the challenges women face and offers valuable insights into women’s social and personal struggles during this period.
Follow Us
Join Our Newsletter
Stay informed about our latest news and events
Contact Us
Email: info@dropsafghanistan.org
Website: dropsafghanistan.org